Mukul Rohatgi has relied upon the decision in Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain Vs. Raju by submitting that in the said case, the accused was absconding and the chargesheet was already filed, whereas in the instant case, the chargesheet filed has been held to be incomplete. In the instant appeal, the main question that falls for our consideration is, whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the statutory right conferred under the proviso to sub section 2 of Section 167 Cr.P.C, on the ground that the investigation qua some of the accused named in the FIR was pending, though the report under sub-section (2) of Section 173 (Chargesheet) against respondents along with the other accused was filed within the prescribed time limit and though the cognizance of the offence was taken by the special court before the consideration of the application of the respondents seeking default bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C.?
We Care India
Webnautical
Larry A. Sherman
91 Club
Tiranga Login
Matthew Hedstrom
Fynd Anything
Fb88 Com
Ames Roofing Inc
New88 Điểm Đến Giải Trí Trực Tuyến